|
|
|
EMLA and the World Resources Institute (WRI) of Washington,
DC, began joint leadership of a major long term project
aimed at developing a rankings system (like Transparency
International's Corruption Perceptions Index or Freedom
House's Survey of Civil Liberties) to measure public
participation in environmental matters worldwide. EMLA
and WRI will develop the indicators, guide the pilot
phase, and present results of the project at the Rio
+10 Earth Summit in 2002. The rankings will be based
on a wide range of indicators, and results will aim
to inform public opinion, spark media attention, and
give states and their governments the impetus to "harmonize
upward" in terms of their performance in "environmental
democracy" matters. The EMLA-WRI team still has
not settled on the project's name, as "Environmental
Democracy" may be prejudicial to some countries
of the Global South who associate "democracy"
language with countries of the North. Environmental
NGO's, UN and World Bank representatives, and government
and private sector funders who have worked with EMLA
and WRI in planning sessions have expressed a common
ownership and great enthusiasm for this very important
project.
|
|
|
|
|
EMLA, acting as the secretariate of the Hungarian United
Nations Environmental Program National Committee (HUNEP),
made great efforts putting together the inaugural board
for the Hungarian UNEP Committee. A number of illustrious
individuals accepted our invitation to serve as board
members. They include the chairman of the Parliament's
Environmental Committee, leading NGO representatives
and government administrators, and one of Hungary's
most prominent businessmen. The inaugural board meeting
took place on June 5, World Environmental Day.
Four workgroups have been set up to contribute to the
plenary committee's overall workplan. These groups are
as follows: 1) "UNEP PR/Communication" to
raise awareness of UNEP and its activities, communicate
environmental issues to the general public, and channel
the position of the National Committee on certain issues
to the media; 2) "Environmental Information"
to clarify the status (public/confidential) of environmental
data and information and clearly define the term itself;
3)"Greening the banks and financial sector"
to raise awareness of environmental issues in the financial
sector, promote examples of environmentally conscious
financial activities, and map the funding sources for
the environmental industry; 4) "Local Agenda 21:
the Rio Earth Summit's Global Agenda 21" to develop
local objectives for creating sustainable communities,
management tools for monitoring local activities, and
community agendas which include sustainable activities.
|
|
Leadership and
Organization
|
|
EMLA, serving as Secretariat of the Environmental Law
Association of CEE/NIS and with Sándor Fülöp currently
holding the organization's directorship, undertook major
efforts to solidify the organization while continuing
to push for the ratification and practical application
of the Aarhus Convention on Public Participation in
members' home countries. EMLA developed a website for
the Association in order to provide a secure communication
environment in which members can share documents and
ask for advice on specific cases. The website, along
with "Environmental Advocacy," the Association's
Newsletter, provides an information source on public
participation issues in the region.
At the end of June, EMLA hosted a three-day conference
which brought the Association members together - for
the first time as a formally organized unit - to develop
common goals and strategies for achieving them. At the
meeting over fifty participants, made up of environmental
and legal advocates from over a dozen countries, had
the opportunity to pool their expertise and influence
to issue a common policy statement. The conference proceedings
will serve as a valuable resource on participation issues
in environmental law. Lastly, we are very pleased to
report that the Association has been officially registered
by the court.
|
|
Pollutant Release and
Transfer Registers (PRTRs)
|
|
In 1996 the OECD issued guidlines for member countries
known as the Pollutant Release and Transfer Register
(PRTR). EMLA has prepared a systematic analysis on how
the Hungarian legal system can move towards fulfilling
the requirements of a fully operational PRTR system.
First we distilled from the international literature
the most basic definitional elements of PRTR as well
as those elements which are vital for constructing an
effective system. Then we reviewed three areas of Hungarian
law (Hazardous Waste, Dangerous Chemicals and Catastrophe
Prevention) for those elements which could form the
core of a PRTR system. Our findings revealed that the
Hungarian legal system contains redundant requirements
concerning the provision of environmental information
services. These should be systematized and simplified
for the good of companies, government, and the public
especially, who currently lack meaningful information
about the dangers hazardous chemicals pose.
The Hungarian environmental NGO community held a conference
in June 2000, where they received EMLA's PRTR findings
with enthusiasm. Based on the experience we collected
during our PRTR study, the Ministry of Environment asked
EMLA to revise its planned Chemical Safety legislation.
|
|
|
|
|
EMLA wrote a study on Hungarian water laws regarding
dams and related issues such as indigenous peoples,
access to information, and expropriation. An international
expert panel working for the World Commission on Dams
(WCD) commissioned the study. The panel is led by a
professor from the American University in Washington,
DC, and contains twelve members including EMLA attorney
Csaba Kiss and otherexperts from countries such as Brazil,
Thailand, Norway, and South Africa. EMLA’s leadership
on the Hungarian side of the WCD project, a worldwide
comparison of laws and practices surrounding dams which
will ultimately become a book, proved especially important
for EMLA as a predecessor the "Environmental Democracy"
project with WRI.
|
|
Assisting a Foreign
Government
|
|
EMLA wrote an expert opinion for the Dutch Government's
Ministry of Environment's Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) Department on development of their transboundary
EIA guidelines. The Dutch Government is operating in
this matter under the auspices of the UN Economic Council
for Europe (UNECE). Our work is a follow-up activity
to a joint research project and workshops. In February
EMLA, serving as the official representative of the
Hungarian government, met with the Dutch government
in Soesterberg, Holland.
|
|
|
|
|
EMLA Scientific Branch Coordinator, Csaba Sándor, participated
in a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Study Tour
which took him to California, USA. The objective of
the study tour was to build EMLA's capacities in the
field of GIS in order to contribute to the development
and use of map-based interface. The tour was financed
by the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI),
the Society for Conservation GIS, and others. Csaba
took two GIS software courses on ArcView GIS at the
ESRI training center in Redlands, and presented a paper
entitled"PRTRs in Central Europe" at the organization’s
annual conference in Idyllwild, CA. ESRI also invited
Csaba to their annual five-day conference for GIS users
which took place in San Diego. The trip was also a success
for EMLA because of the contacts Csaba made from all
over the world of GIS (business, academic, NGO sectors).
One Hungarian GIS firm which Csaba met in San Diego
later helped the EMLA Student Foundation with its digital
imaging analysis needs on the Rákos-patak project.
|
|
|
|
|
EMLA participated in a conference hosted by the Budapest
University of Economics on the importance of company
environmental reports - including use of leaflets, brochures,
and other items - to encourage companies' environmental
compliance, especially in the area of environmental
management systems. Among the nearly forty participants,
NGO's, businesses, municipal governments, and environmental
agencies were equally represented. The debate of the
day centered around whether the information contained
in company environmental reports would be reliable or
just another form of PR and marketing for businesses.
We imagine there is much debate to come, but we are
pleased to begin discussions among these diverse actors.
|
|
|